Popular Posts

Wednesday, February 9, 2011

Russian spy Anna Chapman makes TV debut as presenter

Red-headed Russian spy Anna Chapman has made her debut as a television presenter, hosting a programme about unsolved mysteries in her latest career twist.
Her weekly show, titled Secrets of the World with Anna Chapman, aims to unravel unexplained mysteries, although the makers have confirmed that this will not include any mention of Ms. Chapman's spying activities.
Wearing a clingy red-and-black velvet dress in the Friday night debut, Ms. Chapman appeared stiff as she intoned cheesy catchphrases such as: “My name is Anna Chapman and I will reveal all the secrets.”
The first hour-long episode on privately owned Ren TV investigated the case of a baby in the volatile Caucasus region of Dagestan who attracted hordes of pilgrims in 2009 after verses from the Koran reportedly appeared imprinted on his skin.

Monday, January 17, 2011

The 5 Worst Possible Facebook Status Updates

If you’re still not on the Twitter bandwagon, don’t worry. You’re not missing much. If you have a Facebook page, then you pretty much have a Twitter-like mechanism commonly known as the “Status Update.”
The problem with the status update is there’s no set-in-stone way to use it. With Twitter you only get 140 characters to get your point across. The Facebook status update should work in the same way, but people have yet to figure out things like “brevity” and “coherence.” Thus, we are saddled with having to put up with an endless array of bizarre Update-isms ; proving that if you hand people some micro-blogging technology that has no built in system of rules, they will become flustered and post anything as long as it’s still in the realm of “something.”

sorry being reverse learnt from facebuk ...

5. Inspirational Wisdom

Example: “If you can’t stand by your word you stand for nothing.”
What is it about the status update that turns everybody in to Tony Robbins?  Are people lying on the couch with their laptops slowly heating their nearly bare genitals while trying to come up with pithy enlightening slogans that aren’t even good enough for bumper stickers?
Some Facebook users seem to have some kind of mystical, all-knowing wisdom that was granted to them by a cosmic force that we mere mortals don’t have the brain capacity to even fathom. Sadly, this mystical force only bestowed them with the power to spout out small bursts of intelligence that would seem more convincing if it wasn’t typed and delivered to you by the same person that has an entire Facebook photo album dedicated to that time they got so drunk they couldn’t take another sip without vomiting instantly, so they tried to absorb a bottle of vodka rectally.

4. Quotes

wallce The 5 Worst Possible Facebook Status Updates
Example: “Every man dies. Not every man really lives” – William Wallace
Like Inspirational Wisdom, the quote is a short burst of universal truth being passed on to you, the person that would really rather read an update about how the cops are banging on the door yet the updater refuses to throw down their weapons and release the hostages.
The quote is perhaps the most subversively annoying of the bunch as you have to give it some thought and perform some small observations to fully appreciate its stupidity. Thankfully for you, we did that part for you.
The quote sucks because…
A)     Like Inspirational wisdom, the chances of the person writing it actually living out that quote to the fullest are slim. In fact, the chances are pretty good that the William Walllace quote above was typed in to the status update box while the updater was stuck in a cubicle trying to decided whether they should just walk out of the office and never return, of if they should come back from lunch with a fully loaded Mac-10. They will settled on neither and continue to fill out their time sheets in-between searches for more quotes that they would live by if they didn’t suck at living so much.
B)      Because all friends of the updater give the quote a Thumbs Up, as if the updater had actually come up with the quote themselves. In essence, these people are rewarding and praising the updater for figuring out how to copy and paste…which is the same thing we would do to a monkey if it learned to copy and paste.

3. Being Vague 

vague SU The 5 Worst Possible Facebook Status Updates
Example: “Riding on a wave of self-loathing. If only you could understand.  None of you ever will.”
In every friends list there is the one guy or girl that refuses to ever come out and clarify just what the hell their updates even mean, like they’re some kind of Facebook David Lynch – hiding their messages behind metaphor and perplexing language that can mean almost anything. The example above is something a Funny Crave staff member actually saw on their Facebook news feed not too long ago.
What does it mean? Who knows? But what we do know is that no less than 5 friends of this updater asked the same type of question, “What’s wrong?” and “Is everything okay?” Clearly, people that post vague, cryptic status updates need a hug but feel that performing an actual hug is too “all up in your face.” Perhaps they would be happy with a slight knowing nod as you pass them on the street, or, if you want to go the vague and perplexing route, give them a Thumbs Up then leave a comment where you call them a pretentious drama-feeding ass***.

2. Being Vague, Part 2: Passive Shit-Talking

Example: “Don’t you just hate it when certain ‘best friends’ turn out to be your worst enemies?”
The word “Emo” gets tossed around a lot when it comes to whining and moaning about events or the actions of certain people. While complaining is a common human reaction to bad circumstances, being “Emo” when complaining means your complaints have no balls behind them. If you bitch and whine passively, never once putting a face on what you’re whining about, you’re just showing off one of the many ways a person can be Emo on the internet. That’s when you get shitty status updates where people who are presumably seething with anger think it devilishly slick to advertize their rage in a dreadfully ambiguous way, making sure no one gets offended

1. A Whole lot of Nothing

Example: “Just got home,” “about to shower!” “My dog chewed my sandals while I was in the shower!!!” “Still wet from the shower. ‘bout to eat. Yummmmm!” “This chicken tastes funny” “I think that chicken is giving me the shits!!”
Micro-blogging as given rise to people that feel everything they do is news worthy of ‘round-the-clock news coverage on a cable news channel. “BREAKING: I JUST STEPPED IN DOG SHIT”, “THIS JUST IN: THIS TOOTHPASTE IS TOO MINTY, SADNESS CONSUMES ME”, “NEWSFLASH: MY SHOE LACES, THEY ARE ASKEW.”
Unless the updater is giving an up-to-the-minute account of their current adventure in a dense rain forest as they do battle with demon goats from hell while the fate of mankind hangs in the balance, then they probably shouldn’t be concerned with informing us of their every action.
This mentality is indicative of a person whose life is so mundane that they feel they have to over-compensate by announcing their every thought and action to the world in the hopes that at least one person on their friends list will finally speak up and tell them to just shut their fucking mouths. That one minor digital altercation will be the closest thing to excitement they will have had in months.

worlds prettiest russian hacker


A group of students from the New York University were arrested in the USA on suspicion of 3 million dollars theft from American banks and 9.5 million from British ones. One of the hackers deserves special attention and this is Kristina Svechinskaya – who has already been called the second Anna Chapman and the world’s hottest hacker.

Wednesday, January 12, 2011

Assange: Wikileaks Loses $935,000 Every Week

According to Assange, the site is bleeding about $935,000 every week since the release of the diplomatic cables late last year. He did not explain how Wikileaks is currently being financed, but referred to "financial troubles" and the fact that he did not and could not touch has not touched any of the rumored $2.3 million that was reportedly offered for his autobiography. This number may not be correct anyway as Assange noted that he could earn $1.7 million within a few years, if the book turned out to be a great success.
Despite the financial issues and the fact that Assange cannot move from his current location, Wikileaks is apparently running "almost as before." He said that he feels like a "caged bird."
As for a future leak that will affect banks, Assange told 24 heures that "Bank of America is visibly concerned." Apparently, there was a crisis meeting to review all records. However, the Wikileaks founder said that the documents will not be released in the immediate future as he has "too much to do" with the diplomatic cables.  

CMU Review Of The Year 2010: The music business – CMU News-Blog (blog)



CMU Business Editor Chris Cooke looks back at the key trends and developments in the music industry in 2010.
 EMI
However well you’re doing on a day-to-day basis, and EMI is doing quite well on a day-to-day basis, a very public multi-billion pound loan with an unfriendly bank that comes with severe covenants you’ve no way of sticking to is gonna get you down. Which is possibly why EMI keeps losing key executives. And certainly why the London major has been in the news so much this year.
In March, Elio Leoni-Sceti, the CEO of the EMI recordings business, abruptly quit just weeks after telling Management Today how much he liked the job. Former ITV boss Charlie Allen took over with lots of grand plans, only to be replaced himself in June by EMI’s publishing chief Roger Faxon.
Those loan covenants required owners Terra Firma to inject over £100 million into EMI in June, and for a time it seemed likely the equity group’s financial backers wouldn’t let them. In the end they did. But a similar cash injection will be needed in 2011 and it seems even more likely Terra Firma’s backers will block it.
This has all meant constant and continuing speculation that Terra Firma will have to give EMI up to its bank, which will almost certainly sell the music firm on, possibly splitting it up first. It was thought Warner would buy the record labels and BMG the publishing company, though the latter has now said it’s more interested in EMI’s recordings business. Whatever, there will be more dramas at EMI in 2011; whether it will still be here this time next year is another matter.
TERRA FIRMA V CITIGROUP
Probably the most amusing chapter of the EMI saga this year was when the major’s owners Terra Firma took the bank to which the music firm owes three billion, Citigroup, to court in New York. The equity group had begun legal proceedings in late 2009 after the US bank refused to restructure the mega-loan Terra Firma had saddled EMI with when it bought the music company in 2007. Terra Firma boss Guy Hands claimed Citigroup man David Wormsley had given him dud advice that made him bid too high and too soon for EMI back in 2007.
Wormsley had lied, Hands said, because he and Citigroup had a vested interest (ie money to make) in seeing Terra Firma’s takeover of EMI happen. Hands had a very clear recollection of receiving three phone calls from Wormsley in the days before buying EMI. But, alas, the calls had not been documented, and Hands’ memory of everything else ahead of the big EMI purchase – with the exception of the biscuits he ate – was rather hazy. Hands came over as a bit of a bumbling, bitter fool, and the jury didn’t buy his story. A court defeat which many reckon will make it even harder for Hands to persuade his backers to pump more money into EMI in 2011.
LIVE IN THE USA
The record industry is in terminal decline, but the live industry is booming, right? Well, parts of the live industry have been booming over the last decade, but not all parts, and not in all markets. And in 2010, in the most important market, the live music industry peaked. For years, with ever rising ticket prices, and more and more additional fees added by promoters, venues and ticket agents, pessimists had been predicting the bubble would burst. And in the US in 2010 it did. 
For the media, that the live industry had peaked was best illustrated through the share price of Live Nation, the biggest live music company of them all, whose merger with Ticketmaster was only fully approved in the UK in May. In July, their top execs Michael Rapino and Irving Azoff admitted ticket sales were down and looked likely to decline further. They insisted it was a temporary wobble, but their share price promptly fell 16%, leading to a frustrated Azoff railing against his shareholders, accusing them of being “short-sighted”. Ticket prices have been cut and all those add-on fees curtailed. Now it remains to be seen whether the US live market will recover in 2011, and whether any of that gloom will cross the Atlantic to impact on the still pretty healthy UK live sector.
 HMV AND MAMA
A company which could do with the UK live industry staying in relatively good health is HMV, whose only good news this year came from the gigs and venues side of its business. HMV has such a thing because, just before Christmas last year, it announced its intent to buy the MAMA Group, the London-based venue owning, festival and gig promoting, artist managing, brand partnering company, and one of the UK music industry’s success stories of recent years. The deal went through in February. Some streamlining followed, but MAMA – as a stand alone business within the HMV Group – still seems to be doing rather well.
It’s a shame for HMV that the same can’t be said about its retail business, which is what most investment types in the City focus on. After enjoying a little boost in recent years thanks to the demise of pretty much every major competitor in entertainment retail, the HMV shops had a difficult year amid rising supermarket and online competition, not to mention the wider recession. Attempts to diversify the HMV retail business were not as well received as the company’s diversification into live, and the firm’s share price has slumped. Though optimists point out that, while the shops may be ultimately doomed, with its MAMA acquisition HMV still has long term potential. That might mean, with that slumping share price, HMV is now a takeover target.
 RISE OF BMG
Of course it’s not all doom and gloom in the world of music rights, with some of the opinion there is still much money to be made from exploiting the various music-based copyrights, though probably by applying a different business model than that of the traditional record company. Probably most interesting in this domain is the all new BMG. Having sold off itsr old music publishing company to Universal and its record company to Sony, German media giant Bertelsmann launched BMG Rights Management in 2008, a new company that would manage and monetise all kinds of music rights, straddling the record and publishing industries.
Bertelsmann later sold half the company to equity types KKR, securing itself a big pot of cash for buying up recording and (mainly so far) publishing catalogues, and the acquisition spree continued in 2010, with BMG absorbing the likes of Evergreen, Stage Three, Adage, PRK Music, Cherry Lane and, perhaps most notably, Chrysalis in the last twelve months. Meanwhile, a number of new offices were opened and single artists deals announced. In terms of growth through acquisition it’s been a big year for BMG, making it a very interesting company to watch in 2011, as Bertelsmann makes moves to reclaim its seat around the ‘major music company’ table.
SIMON COWELL
Love him or loathe him, you can’t deny that Simon Cowell went from strength to strength in 2010, as the ‘X-Factor’ machine, for reasons best known to no one, only grew in popularity in the UK, while global expansion of the X franchise saw its founder quit his job as judge on ‘American Idol’ so he could launch an American version of the show.
But Cowell’s biggest achievement of the year was probably his new deal with Sony Music regarding the Syco business, which was previously a division of the major. With Syco reportedly responsible for at least half its UK’s revenue, Sony Music was clearly going to be generous in its bid to ensure Cowell stayed with them once his contract came up for renewal this year. The deal that was done made Syco a stand alone company in which both Sony and Cowell (and his business partners) would have a stake. Cowell enters 2011 even more powerful in the world of pop-based music and telly. 
 MUTE
The indie community had some good news in 2010, the Mute label was rejoining them after eight years as a division of EMI. In September, Mute chief Daniel Miller announced a deal with EMI UK which would make his record company a stand alone business once more, albeit with the major as a distribution partner. Miller would also continue to consult for EMI which was keeping some of Mute’s more bankable artists on its rosters.
The deal means the Mute label will be able to work more closely with the Mute publishing company that remained independent throughout. Meanwhile, Miller announced the launch of a Mute artist management agency. With recordings, publishing and management now all under one roof, Mute will be a indie to watch in 2011.

How Free Download Music Sites can Offer a Legal P2P File Sharing Program

Tuesday, October 12th, 2010
If you are looking online for a P2P file sharing program you can find one on any number of free download music sites. Many would claim P2P music downloads to be illegal, and most of the time they would be right, but peer to peer file sharing is not intrinsically illegal, and it would be wrong to claim it to be so.
Certainly, the large music conglomerates will claim them to be so and some would tend to support them in that accusation, particularly the producers and artists, but it is not, in fact, illegal for two people to share their files. If it is not illegal for two to share computer files, then it should not be illegal for three to share, and so on and on and on. . .
It is understandable that artists and music studios get annoyed when their products are being shared online, but there are two points to be discussed here: the legal situation and the moral situation. Let’s look at each of these in order given:
The Legal Aspects of a P2P File Sharing Program
A P2P file sharing program is not illegal. What all of this hullabaloo is about is copyright, and the fact that peer to peer downloads of material that is still protected by copyright is illegal. That is not in dispute! Nobody could agree that it is correct for one person to steal another’s work, and present it as their own. That is either plagiarism or breach of copyright, and nobody could realistically argue that it is not.
It is therefore illegal to copy another artist’s work by using P2P file sharing software to connect one hard disk to another and copy the files on the one to the other – even if the music files on the first had been paid for. However, not all free download music sites do that, because many young musicians and singers will offer their work free online in order to get themselves better known.
One favorite of the free download music sites available is Jamendo, where you will find legitimate legal music downloads from independent artists that want their work to be published and better known. You can download tracks or even entire albums legally using your own P2P file sharing program, and another is Legal Torrents, where you can find a large number of legal media files to download with your P2P file sharing program.
This is a typical legal P2P site that offers legal online downloads of music, movies, games and audio-books plus a lot more. This is just one example of the type of free download music sites you are liable to come across when you are looking for a P2P file sharing program online.
It is therefore illogical to infer that all free download music sites are illegal, and that a P2P file sharing program must be breaking the law. There are many legal uses to which peer to peer software can be put. The Moral Aspects of a P2P File Sharing Program
When it comes to the morality of using peer to peer software, here too there are no issues if it is being used legally. However, there are both legal and moral issues if the software is used to download copyright protected work and not all of these side with music and movie companies, particularly with respect to downloading music.
Where is it immoral for somebody wanting to check out the quality of new artists before buying their work? Many people use P2P file sharing program to check out a track or two before purchasing an album. Some also use free download music sites to test an artist’s work before buying tickets for a live gig. There is nothing wrong with that even though it might be illegal.
Where it is both illegal and morally wrong is for people to get a free download of a movie or music tracks in order to avoid paying for it. The way for the music industry to prevent that is to offer free tracks from albums that can be used as testers by potential customers. By doing that, anybody who then uses P2P file sharing software to download copyright protected material will then be fair game.
It is not the software that is illegal but the people that use it illegally, and the music companies should use some initiative in getting the moral high ground by offering their own free download music sites and making it less necessary for people to test albums and artists by breaking the law.

P2P File-Sharing: Evaluate the Risks

Sunday, October 10th, 2010
Millions of computer users share files on the web daily. Whether it is music, games, or software, file-sharing can provide people with access to a wealth of information. You simply download special software which connects your computer to an informal network of  computers which are running the same software. At any time, millions of users could potentially be connected to each other through this software, sharing files. The software is usually free and easily accessible online.
Sounds great, right? Maybe, but make sure that you consider the trade-offs. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC), the nation’s consumer protection agency, warns that file-sharing can be very risky. For example, when you are connected to any file-sharing network, you may be unknowingly allowing others to copy some of your private files which you never intended to share, some of which could be confidential, such as financial spreadsheets or resumes. You may also unwittingly download material that is protected by  copyright law and find yourself facing legal action. You may download a virus or facilitate a security breach. Or you may unwittingly download pornography, which is often labeled as something else on P2P networks to trick people into downloading it.
To secure the personal information stored on your computer, the FTC (Federal Trade Commission for Consumers) suggests that you:
* Set up the file-sharing software very carefully. If you don’t check the proper settings when you first install the software, you could accidentally open access not just to the files which you intended to share, but also to other information stored on your hard drive, such as your tax returns, emails, medical records, photos, or other personal documents.
* Be aware of spyware. Some file-sharing programs install other software known as spyware. Spyware discreetly monitors a user’s browsing habits and then sends that information onto third parties. Sometimes the user gets ads based on the information that the spyware has collected and disseminated. In some cases, Spyware can be very difficult to detect and remove. Before you use any file-sharing program, you may want to buy security software which can prevent the downloading of spyware or help detect it on your hard drive.
* Close your connection. In some instances, closing the file-sharing program window does not actually close your connection to the network. That allows file-sharing to continue and could increase your security risk. If you have a high-speed connection to the Internet, you usually stay connected to the Internet unless you turn off the computer or disconnect your Internet service, such as your router. These always on connections could allow others to copy your shared files at any time. What’s more, many file-sharing programs automatically launch every time you start up your computer. As a preventive measure, you may want to change the file-sharing program’s settings to prevent the file-sharing program from automatically opening.
* Use an effective anti-virus program and update it on a regular basis. Files which you download could easily contain a virus or other unwanted content. Use anti-virus software to help protect your computer from viruses you might pick up from other users through the file-sharing program. Not all anti-virus programs block files downloaded through file-sharing, so check your program’s capabilities and settings. In addition, avoid downloading files with extensions like .exe, .scr, .lnk, .bat, .vbs, .dll, .bin, and .cmd as these are usually malicious.
It’s a good idea to talk with your family about file-sharing. Parents may not be aware that their children have downloaded file-sharing software on the family computer and that they may have exchanged games, videos, music, pornography, or other material that may not be appropriate for them. Also, because other peoples’ files sometimes are mislabeled, kids unintentionally may download these files. In addition, children may not understand the security and other risks involved with file-sharing and may install the software incorrectly, giving anyone on the Internet access to the family’s private computer files.

Search This Blog